2026 · 8th Annual Edition

The top ten are steady.
The bottom is getting worse.
The middle is disappearing.

Out Leadership's 8th annual State LGBTQ+ Business Climate Index. Six states have held the top tier every year since 2019. Seven have held the bottom every year. Between them, the gap has widened by 11 points, and three of America's biggest Fortune 500 hubs now sit in open conflict with their own state laws.

The premise

Policy is lived. Climate is felt. Both show up on the P&L.

Eight years ago, Out Leadership set out to measure something the corporate world had never quantified: what it actually feels like to live LGBTQ+ in each U.S. state, and what that lived experience costs the businesses operating there. The framework was built on a premise that has only sharpened with time. The laws, courts, and political climates that shape an LGBTQ+ person's daily life are the same forces that shape where companies can recruit talent, retain executives, win contracts, and keep their people safe. The Index measures both at once, year after year, so leaders and lawmakers can see what their decisions actually cost — in dollars, in talent, and in lives.

What we found

Six findings that defined 2026.

Each finding is sourced and footnoted in the full report. The expanded 32-indicator framework, debuting this year, captures legislative shifts the legacy 20-indicator framework couldn't see.

Texas, Florida and Maine each drop seven ranks under the new methodology.
Texas and Florida fall because the expanded 32-indicator framework now registers three years of legislation the legacy framework couldn't measure, bathroom restrictions, drag laws, DEI bans, attorney-general litigation. Maine falls because peer states passed protective laws it didn't.
103
Fortune 500 companies headquartered in states scoring "high tension" on the new Corporate-Policy Alignment indicator.
Texas (54 HQs), Ohio (27) and Florida (22), 103 companies in all, score 1 on the new alignment metric, meaning their state policy environments now openly conflict with the LGBTQ+ workplace standards their employers already hold themselves to.
Source: HRC CEI + Fortune 500 HQ data, 2026
21
State attorneys general now actively litigate against LGBTQ+ rights.
Under the new Attorney General Score, 21 of 50 sitting AGs land in the most-hostile tier. Four, Ken Paxton (TX), Todd Rokita (IN), James Uthmeier (FL), and Jonathan Skrmetti (TN), are flagged for directly targeting corporations over DEI and LGBTQ+-inclusive practices.
Source: Federal court records · 2026 Index AG coding · Ropes & Gray review
$324B
Annual GDP being forgone by states without comprehensive nondiscrimination protections.
Applying the Williams Institute's 3% inclusion-dividend estimate to BEA's 2025 state GDP data shows roughly $324 billion in annual output left on the table. About $171 billion of that sits in Texas, Florida and Ohio alone.
The seven-year sort: top ten steady, bottom ten getting worse, middle vanishing.
Massachusetts, New York, Connecticut, New Jersey, Vermont and California have held the top tier every year since 2019. Arkansas, South Carolina, Tennessee, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Oklahoma have held the bottom tier every year since 2019. The gap between them has widened by 11 points.
Vetoes pay off: governor leadership lifted Kentucky, Illinois, Michigan, New Mexico, and Maryland over seven years.
The states that have most improved over the seven-year history of the Index share a pattern: a governor consistently using the veto pen to block restrictive legislation. Andy Beshear (KY), JB Pritzker (IL, +4 ranks), Gretchen Whitmer (MI), Michelle Lujan Grisham (NM), and Wes Moore (MD) anchor the long-term improvers.

Read the Full Report (PDF)

The 50-state picture

Click any state to see its 2026 score, finding, and share kit.

Each state's color reflects its 2026 expanded score on the 0–100 scale. Pick one — on the map or from the list — to load its rank, the press-worthy finding, a side-by-side compare tool, a ready-to-post share kit (caption + image), and three actions built for that state's tier.

High (75+) Mid-High (60–74) Mid (45–59) Low-Mid (30–44) Low (under 30)

Open Full Interactive Map →

Rankings

The 2026 leaders. The bottom of the table.

Top 10

Bottom 10

See All 50 States Ranked

CEO Business Briefs

A briefing for every state.

Pro bono legal review by Ropes & Gray. Each Brief gives executives the score, the political environment, the talent and economic implications, and the strategic considerations specific to that state.

Open the CEO Briefs Find a State on the Map
Voices

From governors and equality leaders.

Six governors and the Movement Advancement Project on what the data means — and what business leaders should do about it.

Why this matters

Policy is a P&L line.

76% of Gen Z workers say they will not take jobs in anti-equality states. (HRC, 2025)

$3.76 billion in canceled investments and conventions cost North Carolina after HB2. (Associated Press)

75% of consumers say they will boycott companies that fail to take a stand on LGBTQ+ inclusion. (FCB, 2024)

3% GDP gain is what the Williams Institute estimates the U.S. economy could see from full LGBTQ+ workforce inclusion. (Williams Institute)

Defensible methodology

32 indicators. 5 categories. One transparent framework.

Every score links back to a public data source, MAP, HRC, the Williams Institute, the ALA, NCSL, BEA, the Census, the FBI, the CDC, the ACLU, and federal court records. Every indicator's rubric is published. The CEO Business Briefs were reviewed pro bono by Ropes & Gray.

Read the Methodology

  • 1Legal / Non-Discrimination, 6 indicators, 30 max points
  • 2Youth / Family, 7 indicators, 35 max points
  • 3Political / Religious, 6 indicators, 30 max points
  • 4Health / Safety, 6 indicators, 30 max points
  • 5Work / Economic, 7 indicators, 35 max points
Get the report

Read the full 2026 Index.

The complete report includes the 32-indicator framework, all state and territory scoring, year-over-year movers and drivers, post-Chiles v. Salazar conversion-therapy analysis, and the full economic-impact case.

Download Full Report (PDF) View Prior Editions (2019–2025)